investigation-summary Skill
Draft an audience-specific summary from the privileged investigation memo — HR, leadership, or outside counsel versions. Use when an investigation memo needs to be communicated to an audience that should not see the full privileged work product. Published by anthropics in claude-for-legal.
Decision snapshot
Is this a fit?
Data analysis, Includes SKILL.md, Reusable instructions
Compatibility not yet detected.
Permission behavior not yet detected.
Copy skill directory
24 days ago · Apache-2.0 license
No specific cautions were detected. Review the source and requested permissions before installing.
What is investigation-summary Skill?
Draft an audience-specific summary from the privileged investigation memo — HR, leadership, or outside counsel versions. Use when an investigation memo needs to be communicated to an audience that should not see the full privileged work product. Published by anthropics in claude-for-legal. This profile combines repository metadata with install, compatibility, and usage signals so developers can quickly decide whether it fits their agent workflow before opening the source repository.
Automated repository signals based on public metadata such as recency, license, installation evidence, and adoption. These are not a security audit or endorsement. See how SkillIndex evaluates profiles.
Key capabilities
- Includes SKILL.md support
- Reusable instructions support
- Data analysis
- Data analysis use cases
Declared skill metadata
- Source file: employment-legal/skills/investigation-summary/SKILL.md
These fields retain source and confidence evidence from the indexed SKILL.md.
Compatibility and setup
- Install or run with Copy skill directory
When to use investigation-summary Skill
- Use it for data analysis.
Built with
Editorial notes
Source
- Creator: anthropics
- Repository: anthropics/claude-for-legal
- Skill file: employment-legal/skills/investigation-summary/SKILL.md
What it does
Draft an audience-specific summary from the privileged investigation memo — HR, leadership, or outside counsel versions. Use when an investigation memo needs to be communicated to an audience that should not see the full privileged work product.
Skill instructions
/investigation-summary Drafts a stripped-down, audience-appropriate summary from the privileged investigation memo. HR summaries contain no privilege analysis. Leadership summaries are high-level. Outside counsel briefings include full context. Instructions 1. Load the internal-investigation reference skill and run Mode 5 (Audience summary). 2. If no memo exists yet, offer to draft the memo first. 3. HR summaries must not include attorney mental impressions, credibility methodology, or legal exposure analysis. Examples /employment-legal:investigation-summary [matter name] hr /employment-legal:investigation-summary [matter name] leadership /employment-legal:investigation-summary [matter name] outside-counsel Detailed audience-stripping rules and summary templates live in the internal-investigation reference skill — load it before doing substantive work.
Verified compatibility and discovery
Frequently asked questions
What is investigation-summary?
investigation-summary is a open-source AI agent skill with Copy skill directory. Draft an audience-specific summary from the privileged investigation memo — HR, leadership, or outside counsel versions.
Who is investigation-summary best for?
investigation-summary is best for reusing agent instructions, scripts, and references, data analysis workflows.
How do I install investigation-summary?
Install or run investigation-summary using Copy skill directory. Check investigation-summary for the latest setup command.
Is investigation-summary actively maintained?
investigation-summary may need a closer maintenance check before production use.
Project health auto-fetched from the source repository.
Maintain this resource?
Review this source-backed profile, send a correction with evidence, or link to it from your documentation. Claims verify your relationship to the project; profile facts still require source evidence and editorial review.
