comments Skill
Review open NPRM comment periods, log decisions, track deadlines. Use when an NPRM has a comment window open and you need to surface deadlines, decide whether to file, or record a filing / not-filing / waived decision (--decide CMT-ID). Published by anthropics in claude-for-legal.
Decision snapshot
Is this a fit?
Documentation, Includes SKILL.md, Reusable instructions
Compatibility not yet detected.
Permission behavior not yet detected.
Copy skill directory
25 days ago · Apache-2.0 license
No specific cautions were detected. Review the source and requested permissions before installing.
What is comments Skill?
Review open NPRM comment periods, log decisions, track deadlines. Use when an NPRM has a comment window open and you need to surface deadlines, decide whether to file, or record a filing / not-filing / waived decision (--decide CMT-ID). Published by anthropics in claude-for-legal. This profile combines repository metadata with install, compatibility, and usage signals so developers can quickly decide whether it fits their agent workflow before opening the source repository.
Automated repository signals based on public metadata such as recency, license, installation evidence, and adoption. These are not a security audit or endorsement. See how SkillIndex evaluates profiles.
Key capabilities
- Includes SKILL.md support
- Reusable instructions support
- Documentation
- Documentation use cases
Declared skill metadata
- Source file: regulatory-legal/skills/comments/SKILL.md
These fields retain source and confidence evidence from the indexed SKILL.md.
Compatibility and setup
- Install or run with Copy skill directory
When to use comments Skill
- Use it for documentation.
Built with
Editorial notes
Source
- Creator: anthropics
- Repository: anthropics/claude-for-legal
- Skill file: regulatory-legal/skills/comments/SKILL.md
What it does
Review open NPRM comment periods, log decisions, track deadlines. Use when an NPRM has a comment window open and you need to surface deadlines, decide whether to file, or record a filing / not-filing / waived decision (--decide CMT-ID).
Skill instructions
/comments Purpose NPRMs have deadlines. The decision to file a comment or not is an attorney call — but the deadline disappearing without a logged decision is the risk. This skill surfaces open comment periods and records decisions. Load context ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/regulatory-legal/comment-tracker.yaml → all tracked NPRMs and their status. ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/regulatory-legal/CLAUDE.md → default comment decision owner. Default view — open comment periods markdown Comment Period Tracker — [date] ⏰ Deadline in <14 days | ID | Regulation | Deadline | Days left | Decision | Owner | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | CMT-001 | [name] | [date] | [N] | Undecided | [owner] | 🟡 Open (14 days) [same table] Recently decided | ID | Regulation | Decision | Rationale | |---|---|---|---| | CMT-002 | [name] | Not filing | [reason] | --- Total open: [N] Undecided with deadline <30 days: [N] Log a decision /regulatory-legal:comments --decide CMT-001 Decision: [filin
Verified compatibility and discovery
Frequently asked questions
What is comments?
comments is a open-source AI agent skill with Copy skill directory. Review open NPRM comment periods, log decisions, track deadlines. Use when an NPRM has a comment window open and you need to surface deadlines, decide whether to file, or record a filing / not-filing / waived.
Who is comments best for?
comments is best for reusing agent instructions, scripts, and references, documentation workflows.
How do I install comments?
Install or run comments using Copy skill directory. Check comments for the latest setup command.
Is comments actively maintained?
comments may need a closer maintenance check before production use.
Project health auto-fetched from the source repository.
Maintain this resource?
Review this source-backed profile, send a correction with evidence, or link to it from your documentation. Claims verify your relationship to the project; profile facts still require source evidence and editorial review.
