Favicon of rpi-review

rpi-review Skill

AI Agent SkillPythonOpen source

Compare RPI planning and implementation evidence, record review findings, and route follow-up work. Use when an implementation needs acceptance review. Published by microsoft in hve-core.

Decision snapshot

Is this a fit?

Best for

Research, Includes SKILL.md, Reusable instructions

Works with

Compatibility not yet detected.

Access

Permission behavior not yet detected.

Setup

Copy skill directory

Project health

1 month ago · MIT license

Considerations

No specific cautions were detected. Review the source and requested permissions before installing.

What is rpi-review Skill?

Compare RPI planning and implementation evidence, record review findings, and route follow-up work. Use when an implementation needs acceptance review. Published by microsoft in hve-core. This profile combines repository metadata with install, compatibility, and usage signals so developers can quickly decide whether it fits their agent workflow before opening the source repository.

Trust signal
95/100
Maintenance signal
90/100
Adoption signal
79/100

Automated repository signals based on public metadata such as recency, license, installation evidence, and adoption. These are not a security audit or endorsement. See how SkillIndex evaluates profiles.

Key capabilities

  • Includes SKILL.md support
  • Reusable instructions support
  • Research
  • Research use cases

Declared skill metadata

  • Declared license: MIT
  • Source file: .github/skills/rpi/rpi-review/SKILL.md

These fields retain source and confidence evidence from the indexed SKILL.md.

Compatibility and setup

Copy skill directory
  • Install or run with Copy skill directory

When to use rpi-review Skill

  • Use it for research.

Built with

PythonCopy skill directory

Editorial notes

Source

  • Creator: microsoft
  • Repository: microsoft/hve-core
  • Skill file: .github/skills/rpi/rpi-review/SKILL.md

What it does

Compare RPI planning and implementation evidence, record review findings, and route follow-up work. Use when an implementation needs acceptance review.

Skill instructions

RPI Review Goal Produce one complete, human-readable, evidence-based review record after implementation finishes. Lead with the scoped assessment and material findings, keep evidence and resolution conditions with each finding, and make the final decisions easy to distinguish from the assessment. Compare the complete supplied acceptance boundary once, as quickly as the evidence permits. The review parent authors the record and owns the final outcome, every route disposition, continuation, and user conversation. Read references/review.md for the review document contract, method, optional helpers, outcome vocabulary, routing, and conversation protocol. Use templates/review-log.md as the canonical record skeleton. Flow 1. Resolve one task artifact set: current task-centered plan, latest plan critique when one ran, changes record, and relevant research. Use supplied paths or the stable task slug and date. Stop if multiple unrelated sets remain ambiguous. 2. Resolve review depth. Use standa

Verified compatibility and discovery

Frequently asked questions

What is rpi-review?

rpi-review is a open-source AI agent skill with Copy skill directory. Compare RPI planning and implementation evidence, record review findings, and route follow-up work. Use when an implementation needs acceptance review.

Who is rpi-review best for?

rpi-review is best for reusing agent instructions, scripts, and references, research workflows.

How do I install rpi-review?

Install or run rpi-review using Copy skill directory. Check rpi-review for the latest setup command.

Is rpi-review actively maintained?

rpi-review may need a closer maintenance check before production use.

Share:

Stars
1,475
Forks
311
Last commit
1 month ago
Last verified
Oct 2, 2026
Metadata fetched
Oct 2, 2026
Repository age
1 year
License
MIT

Project health auto-fetched from the source repository.

Maintain this resource?

Review this source-backed profile, send a correction with evidence, or link to it from your documentation. Claims verify your relationship to the project; profile facts still require source evidence and editorial review.

Alternatives to rpi-review