expert-reviewing Skill
Route code changes to relevant review dimensions based on affected files and folders. Use when reviewing PRs, analyzing code quality, or performing targeted reviews of specific vstest subsystems. Published by microsoft in vstest.
Decision snapshot
Is this a fit?
Testing, Design and media, Includes SKILL.md, Reusable instructions
Compatibility not yet detected.
Permission behavior not yet detected.
Copy skill directory
2 months ago · MIT license
No specific cautions were detected. Review the source and requested permissions before installing.
What is expert-reviewing Skill?
Route code changes to relevant review dimensions based on affected files and folders. Use when reviewing PRs, analyzing code quality, or performing targeted reviews of specific vstest subsystems. Published by microsoft in vstest. This profile combines repository metadata with install, compatibility, and usage signals so developers can quickly decide whether it fits their agent workflow before opening the source repository.
Automated repository signals based on public metadata such as recency, license, installation evidence, and adoption. These are not a security audit or endorsement. See how SkillIndex evaluates profiles.
Key capabilities
- Includes SKILL.md support
- Reusable instructions support
- Testing
- Design and media
- Testing use cases
- Design and media use cases
Declared skill metadata
- Source file: .github/skills/expert-review/SKILL.md
These fields retain source and confidence evidence from the indexed SKILL.md.
Compatibility and setup
- Install or run with Copy skill directory
When to use expert-reviewing Skill
- Use it for testing.
- Use it for design and media.
Built with
Editorial notes
Source
- Creator: microsoft
- Repository: microsoft/vstest
- Skill file: .github/skills/expert-review/SKILL.md
What it does
Route code changes to relevant review dimensions based on affected files and folders. Use when reviewing PRs, analyzing code quality, or performing targeted reviews of specific vstest subsystems.
Skill instructions
Expert Review Routing This skill maps changed folders to review dimensions, enabling focused expert reviews of vstest PRs. Folder → Dimension Routing Table | Folder | Primary Dimensions | |--------|-------------------| | eng/ | Build Script & Infrastructure Hygiene, Dependency & Package Integrity, Source Build & Cross-Platform Compliance | | src/Microsoft.TestPlatform.CrossPlatEngine/ | Parallel Execution & Scheduling Safety, Error Reporting & Diagnostic Clarity, Process Architecture & Host Resolution | | src/vstest.console/ | RunSettings Validation & Inference, Process Architecture & Host Resolution, Environment Variable & Feature Flag Contracts | | test/Microsoft.TestPlatform.Acceptance.IntegrationTests/ | Acceptance Test Coverage Design, Cross-TFM & Framework Resolution, Parallel Execution & Scheduling Safety | | src/Microsoft.TestPlatform.Extensions.BlameDataCollector/ | Crash & Hang Dump Reliability, Error Reporting & Diagnostic Clarity, Environment Variable & Feature Flag Contrac
Verified compatibility and discovery
Frequently asked questions
What is expert-reviewing?
expert-reviewing is a open-source AI agent skill with Copy skill directory. Route code changes to relevant review dimensions based on affected files and folders. Use when reviewing PRs, analyzing code quality, or performing targeted reviews of specific vstest subsystems.
Who is expert-reviewing best for?
expert-reviewing is best for reusing agent instructions, scripts, and references, testing workflows, design and media workflows.
How do I install expert-reviewing?
Install or run expert-reviewing using Copy skill directory. Check expert-reviewing for the latest setup command.
Is expert-reviewing actively maintained?
expert-reviewing may need a closer maintenance check before production use.
Project health auto-fetched from the source repository.
Maintain this resource?
Review this source-backed profile, send a correction with evidence, or link to it from your documentation. Claims verify your relationship to the project; profile facts still require source evidence and editorial review.
