Favicon of maintainer-review

maintainer-review Skill

AI Agent SkillPythonOpen source

Assess a GitHub issue or PR for demonstrated need, supported alternatives, correctness, and maintainer action. Desk review only. Published by openai in openai-agents-python.

Decision snapshot

Is this a fit?

Best for

Design and media, Includes SKILL.md, Reusable instructions

Works with

Compatibility not yet detected.

Access

Permission behavior not yet detected.

Setup

Copy skill directory

Project health

4 days ago · MIT license

Considerations

No specific cautions were detected. Review the source and requested permissions before installing.

What is maintainer-review Skill?

Assess a GitHub issue or PR for demonstrated need, supported alternatives, correctness, and maintainer action. Desk review only. Published by openai in openai-agents-python. This profile combines repository metadata with install, compatibility, and usage signals so developers can quickly decide whether it fits their agent workflow before opening the source repository.

Trust signal
95/100
Maintenance signal
90/100
Adoption signal
100/100

Automated repository signals based on public metadata such as recency, license, installation evidence, and adoption. These are not a security audit or endorsement. See how SkillIndex evaluates profiles.

Key capabilities

  • Includes SKILL.md support
  • Reusable instructions support
  • Design and media
  • Design and media use cases

Declared skill metadata

  • Source file: .agents/skills/maintainer-review/SKILL.md

These fields retain source and confidence evidence from the indexed SKILL.md.

Compatibility and setup

Copy skill directory
  • Install or run with Copy skill directory

When to use maintainer-review Skill

  • Use it for design and media.

Built with

PythonCopy skill directory

Editorial notes

Source

  • Creator: openai
  • Repository: openai/openai-agents-python
  • Skill file: .agents/skills/maintainer-review/SKILL.md

What it does

Assess a GitHub issue or PR for demonstrated need, supported alternatives, correctness, and maintainer action. Desk review only.

Skill instructions

Maintainer Review Objective Make a maintainer decision, not a generic code-review summary. Separate these questions: 1. Is the claimed behavior real? 2. What user outcome or constraint exists independently of the reporter's proposed API or fix? 3. Can supported functionality already achieve that outcome with reasonable composition or configuration? 4. If a gap remains, is the proposed solution the best design and implementation layer? 5. Can normal users plausibly reach the gap, and what happens when they do? 6. Is it important enough to act on now? 7. If this PR did not already exist, would maintainers choose to open and implement the same work? 8. For a PR, is this solution worth merging and maintaining? 9. Can overlapping or stale operations corrupt shared state or clean up resources owned by surviving work? 10. If competing PRs exist, which single implementation path should maintainers pursue? 11. Which ambiguous scope or semantic choices are maintainer-owned product/API decisions,

Verified compatibility and discovery

Frequently asked questions

What is maintainer-review?

maintainer-review is a open-source AI agent skill with Copy skill directory. Assess a GitHub issue or PR for demonstrated need, supported alternatives, correctness, and maintainer action. Desk review only.

Who is maintainer-review best for?

maintainer-review is best for reusing agent instructions, scripts, and references, design and media workflows.

How do I install maintainer-review?

Install or run maintainer-review using Copy skill directory. Check maintainer-review for the latest setup command.

Is maintainer-review actively maintained?

maintainer-review may need a closer maintenance check before production use.

Share:

Stars
29,213
Forks
4,666
Last commit
4 days ago
Last verified
Sep 6, 2026
Metadata fetched
Sep 6, 2026
Repository age
2 years
License
MIT

Project health auto-fetched from the source repository.

Maintain this resource?

Review this source-backed profile, send a correction with evidence, or link to it from your documentation. Claims verify your relationship to the project; profile facts still require source evidence and editorial review.

Alternatives to maintainer-review