Favicon of autoreview

autoreview Skill

AI Agent SkillPythonOpen source

Structured code review when explicitly requested, preferring OpenAI/Codex before Claude. Published by openclaw in agent-skills.

Decision snapshot

Is this a fit?

Best for

Security review, Data analysis, Includes SKILL.md, Reusable instructions

Works with

Compatibility not yet detected.

Access

Permission behavior not yet detected.

Setup

Copy skill directory

Project health

19 days ago · MIT license

Considerations

No specific cautions were detected. Review the source and requested permissions before installing.

What is autoreview Skill?

Structured code review when explicitly requested, preferring OpenAI/Codex before Claude. Published by openclaw in agent-skills. This profile combines repository metadata with install, compatibility, and usage signals so developers can quickly decide whether it fits their agent workflow before opening the source repository.

Trust signal
95/100
Maintenance signal
90/100
Adoption signal
76/100

Automated repository signals based on public metadata such as recency, license, installation evidence, and adoption. These are not a security audit or endorsement. See how SkillIndex evaluates profiles.

Key capabilities

  • Includes SKILL.md support
  • Reusable instructions support
  • Security review
  • Data analysis
  • Security review use cases
  • Data analysis use cases

Declared skill metadata

  • Source file: skills/autoreview/SKILL.md

These fields retain source and confidence evidence from the indexed SKILL.md.

Compatibility and setup

Copy skill directory
  • Install or run with Copy skill directory

When to use autoreview Skill

  • Use it for security review.
  • Use it for data analysis.

Built with

PythonCopy skill directory

Editorial notes

Source

  • Creator: openclaw
  • Repository: openclaw/agent-skills
  • Skill file: skills/autoreview/SKILL.md

What it does

Structured code review when explicitly requested, preferring OpenAI/Codex before Claude.

Skill instructions

Auto Review Run an independent review when the user or an owning workflow asks for one. This is code review, not Guardian approval routing. Let the reviewer choose how to analyze the change; provide the target, relevant context, and desired severity. Findings are advice to verify, not instructions to apply blindly. Weigh every finding by likelihood, impact, and fix complexity. Fix what is real and likely, or rare but dangerous (data loss, security, money). Skip rare, recoverable edge cases and theoretical timing races whose fix adds disproportionate complexity, and state the accepted tradeoff instead. Before starting a review, read the complete diagnostic and result guidance. It is part of this skill; follow its output-path, status, failure, usage, and diagnostic rules. Run Use scripts/autoreview beside this skill. Keep its custom codex exec path: native codex review cannot combine explicit Git target flags with custom instructions. The helper combines those with evidence, severity fil

Verified compatibility and discovery

Frequently asked questions

What is autoreview?

autoreview is a open-source AI agent skill with Copy skill directory. Structured code review when explicitly requested, preferring OpenAI/Codex before Claude.

Who is autoreview best for?

autoreview is best for reusing agent instructions, scripts, and references, security review workflows, data analysis workflows.

How do I install autoreview?

Install or run autoreview using Copy skill directory. Check autoreview for the latest setup command.

Is autoreview actively maintained?

autoreview may need a closer maintenance check before production use.

Share:

Stars
1,103
Forks
109
Last commit
19 days ago
Last verified
Oct 11, 2026
Metadata fetched
Oct 11, 2026
Repository age
5 months
License
MIT

Project health auto-fetched from the source repository.

Maintain this resource?

Review this source-backed profile, send a correction with evidence, or link to it from your documentation. Claims verify your relationship to the project; profile facts still require source evidence and editorial review.

Alternatives to autoreview