bcquality-al-review Skill
Review Business Central AL code changes using the BCQuality knowledge base. Use when reviewing an AL pull request, a working-tree diff, or a single AL file, and you want findings backed by BCQuality's curated, BC-specific quality rules. Published by microsoft in BCQuality.
Decision snapshot
Is this a fit?
Developers using BCQuality, Includes SKILL.md, Reusable instructions
Compatibility not yet detected.
Permission behavior not yet detected.
Copy skill directory
2 months ago · MIT license
No specific cautions were detected. Review the source and requested permissions before installing.
What is bcquality-al-review Skill?
Review Business Central AL code changes using the BCQuality knowledge base. Use when reviewing an AL pull request, a working-tree diff, or a single AL file, and you want findings backed by BCQuality's curated, BC-specific quality rules. Published by microsoft in BCQuality. This profile combines repository metadata with install, compatibility, and usage signals so developers can quickly decide whether it fits their agent workflow before opening the source repository.
Automated repository signals based on public metadata such as recency, license, installation evidence, and adoption. These are not a security audit or endorsement. See how SkillIndex evaluates profiles.
Key capabilities
- Includes SKILL.md support
- Reusable instructions support
- Developers using BCQuality
Declared skill metadata
- Source file: skills/bcquality-al-review/SKILL.md
These fields retain source and confidence evidence from the indexed SKILL.md.
Compatibility and setup
- Install or run with Copy skill directory
When to use bcquality-al-review Skill
- Use it for developers using bcquality.
Built with
Editorial notes
Source
- Creator: microsoft
- Repository: microsoft/BCQuality
- Skill file: skills/bcquality-al-review/SKILL.md
What it does
Review Business Central AL code changes using the BCQuality knowledge base. Use when reviewing an AL pull request, a working-tree diff, or a single AL file, and you want findings backed by BCQuality's curated, BC-specific quality rules.
Skill instructions
BCQuality AL review This skill drives the BCQuality Entry protocol over the knowledge base that ships inside this plugin. It is the plugin entry point for consumers (orchestrators, CLIs) that do not already know BCQuality's internal conventions — the only convention they need is "invoke this skill for an AL review." BCQuality itself is orchestrator-agnostic content: knowledge files plus routing and action skills. This bridge is the thin consumer glue that lets a plugin host run that content without hardcoding BCQuality's layout. When to use - Reviewing an AL pull request or an uncommitted working-tree diff. - Reviewing a single AL file. - Any task whose goal is "review Business Central / AL code for quality issues." Do not use this skill to generate AL code — it only reviews. Plugin root Resolve PLUGINROOT to the directory that contains this plugin's root plugin.json. This skill lives at PLUGINROOT/skills/bcquality-al-review/SKILL.md, so PLUGINROOT is two levels up from this file. All
Verified compatibility and discovery
Frequently asked questions
What is bcquality-al-review?
bcquality-al-review is a open-source AI agent skill with Copy skill directory. Review Business Central AL code changes using the BCQuality knowledge base. Use when reviewing an AL pull request, a working-tree diff, or a single AL file, and you want findings backed by.
Who is bcquality-al-review best for?
bcquality-al-review is best for reusing agent instructions, scripts, and references.
How do I install bcquality-al-review?
Install or run bcquality-al-review using Copy skill directory. Check bcquality-al-review for the latest setup command.
Is bcquality-al-review actively maintained?
bcquality-al-review may need a closer maintenance check before production use.
Project health auto-fetched from the source repository.
Maintain this resource?
Review this source-backed profile, send a correction with evidence, or link to it from your documentation. Claims verify your relationship to the project; profile facts still require source evidence and editorial review.
